PER CURIAM.
The sole question in this case is the alleged error of the court wherein it said: "Reasonable doubt means, first, what the words themselves indicate, a doubt founded in reason and must arise from the evidence. If, after a fair, impartial consideration of all the facts and circumstances of the case, you have an abiding conviction of the guilt of the accused, to a moral certainty, then of course, you have no reasonable doubt."
This involved no error...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
