MUTHER v. UNITED SHOE MACHINERY CORPORATION


7 F.2d 954 (1925)

MUTHER et al. v. UNITED SHOE MACHINERY CORPORATION.

District Court, D. New Jersey.

August 14, 1925.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Edward F. McClennen, Francis J. V. Dakin, and Dunbar, Nutter & McClennen, all of Boston, Mass., for plaintiffs.

Frederick P. Fish, Edward G. Curtis, Alex D. Salinger, Fish, Richardson & Neave, and Emery, Booth, Janney & Varney, all of Boston, Mass., for defendant.


BODINE, District Judge.

This is an action brought under section 4915 of the Revised Statutes of the United States (Comp. St. § 9460), which is as follows:

"Whenever a patent on application is refused, either by the Commissioner of Patents or by the Supreme Court of the District of Columbia upon appeal from the Commissioner, the applicant may have remedy by bill in equity; and the court having cognizance thereof, on notice to adverse parties and other...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases