WOLF MINERAL PROCESS CORP. v. MINERAL SEPARATION N. A. CORP.

No. 286.

7 F.2d 903 (1925)

WOLF MINERAL PROCESS CORPORATION v. MINERAL SEPARATION NORTH AMERICAN CORPORATION.

District Court, D. Maryland.

August 8, 1925.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Jacob F. Murbach, of Baltimore, Md., William M. Chadbourne, Leonard A. Watson, Willis B. Rice, Clinton De W. Van Siclen, and Carroll R. Ward, all of New York City, and Alfred H. Phillips, of New Haven, Conn., for plaintiff.

Venable, Baetjer & Howard, of Baltimore, Md., Henry D. Williams and William Houston Kenyon, both of New York City, Lindley M. Garrison, of Jersey City, N. J., and Edward Thomas, of New York City, for defendant.


SOPER, District Judge.

Twenty years ago an important invention was made in the art of metallurgy relating to the separation of the metallic substances in pulverized ores from the nonmetallic constituents, consisting of quartz or rocky material, called gangue. In the prior art, ore concentration in actual practice consisted of water or gravity concentration, wherein, under different conditions of agitation, the separation of the quicker settling particles from the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases