1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 9 F.2d
  5. 9 F.2d 883 (1925)
 

IN RE BRANNER

No. 89.

9 F.2d 883 (1925)

In re BRANNER. Ex parte HAAS BROS. FABRICS CORPORATION et al.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

December 7, 1925.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Arthur Mayer and Frank C. Fisher, both of New York City, for appellants and petitioners.

William F. Columbus, of New York City, for appellee and respondent.

Before HOUGH, HAND and MACK, Circuit Judges.

HAND, Circuit Judge (after stating the facts as above).

Our only jurisdiction over the order discharging the rules is by petition to revise under section 24b (Comp. St. § 9608). The proceedings involve none of the "judgments" covered by section 25 (Comp. St. § 9609). The nearest subdivision of that section is (a), (2): "A judgment granting or denying a discharge." An order affirming or denying a composition must indeed be reviewed by appeal. In re Gottlieb...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases