JESSOPH CO. v. BRIGGS & TURIVAS

No. 328.

7 F.2d 883 (1925)

JESSOPH CO., Inc., v. BRIGGS & TURIVAS, Inc.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

June 1, 1925.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Otto A. Samuels, of New York City (Jack Lewis Kraus, II, of New York City, of counsel), for plaintiff in error.

Leo Oppenheimer, of New York City (H. H. Nordlinger and Milton P. Kupfer, both of New York City, of counsel), for defendant in error.

Before ROGERS, HOUGH, and HAND, Circuit Judges.


HOUGH, Circuit Judge (after stating the facts as above).

Two questions are here raised; the first that plaintiff did not make out a prima facie case. We have above recited what we think was proven and no question of law would be elucidated by going into the matter further. It is held that plaintiff gave enough evidence to warrant a verdict, in the absence of any controverting proof.

The other question is whether the above-quoted statement of the answer, viz...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases