SQUIER v. AMERICAN TELEPHONE & TELEGRAPH CO.

No. 309.

7 F.2d 831 (1925)

SQUIER v. AMERICAN TELEPHONE & TELEGRAPH CO.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

May 18, 1925.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

William H. Davis, R. Randolph Hicks, and Samuel E. Darby, Jr., all of New York City, for appellant.

Charles Neave, William R. Ballard, and C. C. Rose, all of New York City, for appellee.

Before ROGERS, HOUGH, and MANTON, Circuit Judges.


HOUGH, Circuit Judge (after stating the facts as above).

As above noted, we express no opinion as to defendant's well-urged proposition that plaintiff's patent is no more than a restatement of what other and earlier inventors long ago told the world, nor, in respect of the differing and irreconcilable opinions of Judge Advocates of different years, need we go further than to say that, while we should, if it were necessary, prefer the earlier opinion as better reasoned...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases