1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 8 F.2d
  5. 8 F.2d 795 (1925)
 

BOST v. REXINE CO.

No. 4200.

8 F.2d 795 (1925)

BOST v. REXINE CO.

Court of Appeals of District of Columbia.

Decided November 2, 1925.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

J. W. Cox and J. T. Sherier, both of Washington, D. C., for plaintiff in error.

L. P. Loving and L. L. Hamner, both of Washington, D. C., for defendant in error.

Before MARTIN, Chief Justice, and ROBB and VAN ORSDEL, Associate Justices.

MARTIN, Chief Justice.

The Rexine Company, now defendant in error, was plaintiff in the municipal court, and sued James Lee Bost, now the plaintiff in error, claiming judgment against him upon a certain promissory note.

There is no issue of fact involved in the case. It appears by stipulation that on March 7, 1923, one R. Spencer Palmer prepared and signed as maker a certain promissory note for the sum of $279.25, payable...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases