STEIN v. UNITED STATES

No. 4654.

9 F.2d 68 (1925)

STEIN v. UNITED STATES.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

November 30, 1925.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Hilton & Christensen and Thomas Ramage, all of San Francisco, Cal., for plaintiff in error.

B. D. Townsend, of San Francisco, Cal., for defendant in error.

Before HUNT, MORROW, and RUDKIN, Circuit Judges.


RUDKIN, Circuit Judge.

This is a writ of error to review a judgment of conviction for contempt. Section 41a of the Bankruptcy Act (Comp. St. § 9625) provides that a person shall not, in proceedings before a referee, among other things, refuse to be examined according to law. Subdivision b of the same section provides:

"The referee shall certify the facts to the judge, if any person shall do any of the things forbidden in this section. The judge shall...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases