1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 3 F.2d
  5. 3 F.2d 776 (1925)
 

STEIL v. HOLLAND

No. 4268.

3 F.2d 776 (1925)

STEIL et al. v. HOLLAND et al.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Rehearing Denied March 9, 1925.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

R. L. McWilliams, of San Francisco, Cal., for plaintiffs in error.

Preston & Duncan, of San Francisco, Cal., for defendants in error.

Before GILBERT, HUNT, and RUDKIN, Circuit Judges.

HUNT, Circuit Judge (after stating the facts as above).

As the record fails to show that defendants below, plaintiffs in error here, moved for an instructed verdict on the ground of the insufficiency of the evidence, the general assignment that the evidence is insufficient to justify the verdict presents no question for review. Bank of Italy v. Romeo (C. C. A.) 287 F. 5. In Penn Casualty Co. v. Whiteway, 210 F. 782, 127 C....

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases