1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 8 F.2d
  5. 8 F.2d 640 (1925)
 

PASHEK v. DUNLOP TYRE & RUBBER CO.

No. 971.

8 F.2d 640 (1925)

PASHEK v. DUNLOP TYRE & RUBBER CO.

District Court, N. D. Ohio, E. D.

June 24, 1925.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

A. E. Merkel, of Cleveland, Ohio, for plaintiff.

Hull, Brock & West, of Cleveland, Ohio, for defendant.

WESTENHAVER, District Judge.

The bill is based on and charges infringement of design patent No. 52,962, issued February 4, 1919, to plaintiff. The patent is for an ornamental design for an automobile tire. The ornamentation is applied to the tread surface. It consists of a central circumferential strap or ridge, continuous grooves on each side thereof, except as broken by lugs connecting the central strap with the skid pads, and a series of skid pads on each side...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases