1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 7 F.2d
  5. 7 F.2d 535 (1925)
 

MODOC COUNTY BANK v. RINGLING

No. 4426.

7 F.2d 535 (1925)

MODOC COUNTY BANK (Formerly Bank of Ft. Bidwell) v. RINGLING et al.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Rehearing Denied September 14, 1925.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Sullivan & Sullivan and Theo. J. Roche, of San Francisco, Cal., for plaintiff in error.

Dunne, Brobeck, Phleger & Harrison and J. Elliott Cook, all of San Francisco, Cal., for defendants in error.

Before GILBERT, HUNT, and MORROW, Circuit Judges.

MORROW, Circuit Judge.

Plaintiff in error, a California banking corporation, was defendant in the court below. Defendants in error are citizens of Montana, and were plaintiffs in the court below. For convenience they will hereinafter be designated as plaintiffs and defendant, as in the lower court.

Plaintiffs were copartners in 1922, engaged in the buying and selling of sheep and lambs.

The cause of action was...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases