1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 10 F.2d
  5. 10 F.2d 517 (1925)
 

WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC & MFG. CO. v. PRECISE MFG. CORPORATION

10 F.2d 517 (1925)

WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC & MFG. CO. et al. v. PRECISE MFG. CORPORATION. SAME v. CHAS. A. BRANSTON, Inc.

District Court, W. D. New York.

August 6, 1925.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Charles Neave and Stephen H. Philbin, both of New York City, for plaintiffs.

Darby & Darby, of New York City (Samuel Darby, Jr., of New York City, and John S. Powers, of Buffalo, N. Y., of counsel), for defendants.

HAZEL, District Judge.

It is unnecessary to discuss the technical aspects of these cases at length, as it appears that both the Fessenden patents in issue for heterodyne apparatus and method inventions have at various times been sustained in this circuit and accorded a broad scope of equivalents (Kintner v. Atlantic Com. Co. [D. C.] 241 F. 956; International Signal Co. v. Vreeland Apparatus Co. [C. C. A.] 278 F. 468); and so also the Armstrong patent in suit for regenerative...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases