1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 8 F.2d
  5. 8 F.2d 389 (1925)
 

FILKINS v. STATE ASSURANCE

No. 2547.

8 F.2d 389 (1925)

FILKINS v. STATE ASSURANCE, Limited. In re U. S. PULP PRODUCTS CORPORATION.

District Court, W. D. New York.

October 23, 1925.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Chapman, Newell & Crane, of Syracuse, N. Y., for plaintiff.

Bond, Schoeneck & King, of Syracuse, N. Y. (Edward L. Robertson, of Syracuse, N. Y., of counsel), for defendant.

HAZEL, District Judge.

Upon carefully considering the proofs, I am satisfied that direction of verdict in favor of plaintiff was a proper disposition of the case. Concededly no question of fact was presented, and each side moved for a peremptory direction of a verdict. No request was made that the issue of whether Warren was agent or broker for plaintiff be submitted to the jury, and accordingly the scope of his employment was for the trial court to determine. Langdon...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases