1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 5 F.2d
  5. 5 F.2d 233 (1925)
 

MATTICE v. MARYLAND CASUALTY CO.

No. 8619.

5 F.2d 233 (1925)

MATTICE v. MARYLAND CASUALTY CO.

District Court, W. D. Washington, N. D.

April 17, 1925.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Clarence L. Reames and H. S. Frye, both of Seattle, Wash., for plaintiff.

John H. Powell and Stephen V. Carey, both of Seattle, Wash., for defendant.

NETERER, District Judge (after stating the facts as above).

All the authorities agree that the only verdict is that which the jury announces orally to the court, and is received and recorded as the jury's finding. Kramer v. Kister, 187 Pa. 227, 40 A. 1008, 44 L. R. A. 432; Section 2635, Thompson on Trials; Hyatt on Trials, § 827; Abbott, Trial Briefs, p. 535. While it was agreed between counsel that the jury, when it agreed upon a verdict, shall cause it to be...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases