1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 8 F.2d
  5. 8 F.2d 227 (1925)
 

SALLEE v. COMMONWEALTH TRUST CO.

No. 4514.

8 F.2d 227 (1925)

SALLEE et al. v. COMMONWEALTH TRUST CO. OF PITTSBURGH et al.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Rehearing Denied November 16, 1925.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Turner K. Hackman, of Twin Falls, Idaho, for appellants and cross-appellees.

Oliver O. Haga, McKeen F. Morrow, and J. D. Eberle, all of Boise, Idaho, for appellees and cross-appellants.

Before GILBERT, HUNT, and RUDKIN, Circuit Judges.

HUNT, Circuit Judge (after stating the facts as above).

Appellants argue that the case should have been dismissed for lack of indispensable parties, because, when the cause was submitted there remained lands for which water rights were outstanding for which settlements had not been made, and that the other settlers must be brought in as indispensable to adjudication of the various claims. Plaintiffs cite Commonwealth Trust Co. v. Smith, 266 U.S. 152...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases