1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 34 F.2d
  5. 34 F.2d 201 (1925)
 

ARMOUR & CO. v. MASTER TIRE & RUBBER CO.

No. 104.

34 F.2d 201 (1925)

ARMOUR & CO. v. MASTER TIRE & RUBBER CO. et al.

District Court, S. D. Ohio, W. D.

August 1, 1925.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

McMahon, Corwin, Landis & Markham, of Dayton, Ohio, for plaintiff.

Toulmin & Toulmin and James & Coolidge, all of Dayton, Ohio, for defendant.

HOUGH, District Judge.

Armour & Co. filed its bill of complaint against the Master Tire & Rubber Company for injunctions and accounting. A basis of the remedy asked is unfair competition in the use of the word "Armour" as a trade-name. The bill of complaint was twice amplified by amendment. Later, the Armour Tire & Rubber Company as well as the receivers for both companies were made parties defendant; the Armour Tire & Rubber Company being subsequently...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases