1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 3 F.2d
  5. 3 F.2d 220 (1925)
 

HOFFMASTER v. JUNKIN

No. 4115.

3 F.2d 220 (1925)

HOFFMASTER et al. v. JUNKIN.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

January 6, 1925.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

W. P. Barnum, of Youngstown, Ohio (McKain & Ohl, of Youngstown, Ohio, on the brief), for plaintiffs in error.

Norman A. Emery and U. C. De Ford, both of Youngstown, Ohio (Harrington, De Ford, Huxley & Smith, of Youngstown, Ohio, on the brief), for defendant in error.

Before DENISON, MACK, and DONAHUE, Circuit Judges.

MACK, Circuit Judge.

Judgment was rendered against plaintiffs in error (hereinafter called defendants) upon their written agreement dated July 8, 1920, guaranteeing the payment of "all purchases heretofore made and that may hereafter be made by the Automotive Tire Service Company (of which they were directors) from Perfection Tire & Rubber Company, Ft. Madison, Iowa, up to the amount of $10,000.00." From April 8, 1920, to September 3, 1920, the purchases aggregated...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases