IN RE STEIN

No. 13967.

7 F.2d 169 (1925)

In re STEIN.

District Court, N. D. California, S. D.

June 20, 1925.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Henry Ach, of San Francisco, Cal., for referee and creditors.

Hilton & Christensen, of San Francisco, Cal., for respondent Stein.

Otto G. Kuklinski, of San Francisco, Cal., for respondent Aurabach.


KERRIGAN, District Judge.

Nathan Stein, the bankrupt herein, has been cited before this court on an order to show cause why he should not be punished for contempt, because he has refused to be examined according to law under section 21 (a) of the Bankruptcy Act (Comp. St. § 9605), regarding certain matters in connection with the administration of the business of the bankrupt prior to the date of bankruptcy.

One...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases