1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 4 F.2d
  5. 4 F.2d 132 (1925)
 

UNITED STATES v. CERTAIN SUBFREIGHTS DUE THE NEPONSET

Nos. 2228, 2277, 2314, 2407.

4 F.2d 132 (1925)

UNITED STATES v. CERTAIN SUBFREIGHTS DUE THE NEPONSET.

District Court, D. Massachusetts.

February 18, 1925.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Blodgett, Jones, Burnham & Bingham, of Boston, Mass., for McCormack Stevedoring Co.

G. Philip Wardner, of Boston, Mass., for petitioner Wambersie & Son.

Chas. F. Dutch and Putnam, Bell, Dutch & Santry, all of Boston, Mass., for Robbins Dry Dock & Repair Co.

Kirlin, Woolsey, Campbell, Hickox & Keating, of New York City, for Standard Oil Co.

LOWELL, District Judge.

All that remains of these cases is the question of interest. This depends on the meaning of section 3 of the Suits in Admiralty Act of March 9, 1920, c. 95, 41 Stat. 525, U. S. Comp. St. Ann. Supp. 1923, § 1251¼ et seq. This act was founded on a bill introduced into the Senate by Senator Jones of Washington on June 26, 1919. Congressional Record, vol. 58, pt. 6, p. 5889. The provision as to...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases