NORTH RIVER INSURANCE COMPANY v. WILSON & TOOMER FERTILIZER COMPANY

Nos. 4353-4362.

5 F.2d 1019 (1925)

NORTH RIVER INSURANCE COMPANY, Plaintiff in Error, v. WILSON & TOOMER FERTILIZER COMPANY, Defendant in Error. PHŒNIX INSURANCE COMPANY, Plaintiff in Error, v. WILSON & TOOMER FERTILIZER COMPANY, Defendant in Error. ST. PAUL FIRE & MARINE INSURANCE COMPANY, Plaintiff in Error, v. WILSON & TOOMER FERTILIZER COMPANY, Defendant in Error. UNITED STATES FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY, Plaintiff in Error, v. WILSON & TOOMER FERTILIZER COMPANY, Defendant in Error. NIAGARA FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY, Plaintiff in Error, v. WILSON & TOOMER FERTILIZER COMPANY, Defendant in Error. ST. PAUL FIRE & MARINE INSURANCE COMPANY, Plaintiff in Error, v. WILSON & TOOMER FERTILIZER COMPANY, Defendant in Error. AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, Plaintiff in Error, v. WILSON & TOOMER FERTILIZER COMPANY, Defendant in Error. GENERAL FIRE ASSURANCE COMPANY, Plaintiff in Error, v. WILSON & TOOMER FERTILIZER COMPANY, Defendant in Error. STERLING FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY, Plaintiff in Error, v. WILSON & TOOMER FERTILIZER COMPANY, Defendant in Error. AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, Plaintiff in Error, v. WILSON & TOOMER FERTILIZER COMPANY, Defendant in Error.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

March 21, 1925.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Daniel MacDougald, of Atlanta, Ga., and W. E. Kay, Thos. B. Adams, and Reuben Ragland, all of Jacksonville, Fla. (Spalding, MacDougald & Sibley, of Atlanta, Ga., Kay, Adams & Ragland, of Jacksonville, Fla., and Underwood, Pomeroy & Haas, of Atlanta, Ga., on the brief), for plaintiffs in error.

Robert R. Milam and George C. Bedell, both of Jacksonville, Fla. (Arthur Y. Milam, B. R. Milam, and G. W. Milam, all of Jacksonville, Fla., on the brief), for defendant in error.

Before WALKER and BRYAN, Circuit Judges, and DAWKINS, District Judge.


BRYAN, Circuit Judge.

It was stipulated by counsel that the above cases should abide the result of the writ of error in Hartford Fire Insurance Company v. Wilson & Toomer Fertilizer Company (No. 4352) 4 F.2d 835, this day decided and affirmed. Accordingly the judgments herein...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases