SIMMEN v. HOVEY

Patent Appeal No. 1780.

8 F.2d 1015 (1925)

Paul J. SIMMEN, Appellant, v. Mark H. HOVEY and Thomas E. Clark, Appellees.

Court of Appeals of District of Columbia.

Decided December 7, 1925.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

L. E. Dodge, of New York City, and Robert Watson, of Washington, D. C., for appellant.

E. N. Pagelsen, of Detroit, Mich., for appellees.

Before MARTIN, Chief Justice, ROBB, Associate Justice, and SMITH, Judge of the United States Court of Customs Appeals.


ROBB, Associate Justice.

This case is closely related to two preceding cases, Patent Appeals Nos. 1776 and 1777, ___ App. D. C. ___, 8 F.2d 1014, which involved the same testimony and the same application of Clark and Hovey.

Simmen's application was filed March 13, 1915, and, since he has taken no testimony, he is restricted to that date for conception and reduction to practice. The tribunals below have held that the testimony...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases