RIMAILHO v. HOLT

Patent Appeal No. 1721.

8 F.2d 1015 (1925)

Emile RIMAILHO, Appellant, v. Pliny E. HOLT, Appellee.

Court of Appeals of District of Columbia.

Decided December 7, 1925.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

E. G. Curtis and N. N. Sanders, both of New York City, and A. D. Adams, of Washington, D. C., for appellant.

Melville Church, of Washington, D. C., for appellee.

Before MARTIN, Chief Justice, ROBB, Associate Justice, and SMITH, Judge of the United States Court of Customs Appeals.


ROBB, Associate Justice.

Appeal from a decision of the Patent Office in an interference proceeding, awarding priority of invention to the party Holt.

The invention covers means for supporting heavy artillery, and involves a construction in which the gun-supporting frame has its ends carried by independently driven tractors of the caterpillar type. In the Patent Office the issue largely turned upon the question of Holt's diligence; Rimailho not having taken...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases