1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 8 F.2d
  5. 8 F.2d 1014 (1925)
 

HOWE v. CLARK

Patent Appeals Nos. 1777, 1776.

8 F.2d 1014 (1925)

Winthrop K. HOWE, Appellant, v. Thomas E. CLARK and Mark H. Hovey, Appellees. Winthrop K. HOWE, Appellant, v. Thomas E. CLARK and Mark H. Hovey, Appellees.

Court of Appeals of District of Columbia.

Decided December 7, 1925.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

L. K. Sager, of New York City, for appellant.

E. N. Pagelsen, of Detroit, Mich., for appellees.

Before MARTIN, Chief Justice, ROBB, Associate Justice, and SMITH, Judge of the United States Court of Customs Appeals.

ROBB, Associate Justice.

Appeal No. 1777 is from concurrent decisions of the Patent Office in an interference proceeding awarding priority to the joint applicants, Clark and Hovey. The invention covers a train control system intended to keep the speed of the train within certain limits, depending upon the condition of the track in advance, and also to indicate such track conditions to the engineer. The invention is defined in the counts in general and broad terms...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases