PRATHER v. TELLIER

Patent Appeal. No. 1742.

5 F.2d 1010 (1925)

George W. PRATHER, Appellant, v. Roy G. TELLIER and William Hoskins, Appellees.

Court of Appeals of District of Columbia.

Decided June 1, 1925.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

J. E. Stryker, of St. Paul, Minn., and A. V. Cushman, of Washington, D. C., for appellant.

J. H. Lee, of Chicago, Ill., R. F. Steward and N. J. Jewett, both of Washington, D. C., and J. Q. Rice and M. C. Massie, both of New York City, for appellees.

Before MARTIN, Chief Justice, and ROBB and VAN ORSDEL, Associate Justices.


PER CURIAM.

Appeal from concurrent decisions of the Patent Office tribunals in an interference proceeding, which is one of a series of interferences, awarding priority to the party Tellier. The invention relates to the baking of suitable clay and the crushing of it to make it granular, for softening hard water. The issue here, as before the Patent Office, is one of fact, and the concurrent decisions of the three tribunals below, covering as they do almost 60 printed...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases