1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 7 F.2d
  5. 7 F.2d 999 (1925)
 

PHILADELPHIA WAREHOUSE CO. v. SEEMAN

No. 220.

7 F.2d 999 (1925)

PHILADELPHIA WAREHOUSE CO. v. SEEMAN et al.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

May 11, 1925.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Leventritt, Riegelman, Carns & Goetz, of New York City (David Leventritt, Charles A. Riegelman, and Norman S. Goetz, all of New York City, of counsel), for plaintiff in error.

Cohen, Cole & Weiss, of New York City (Samuel F. Frank, Harry J. Leffert, and Arthur W. Weil, all of New York City, of counsel), for defendants in error.

Before HOUGH, MANTON, and HAND, Circuit Judges.

MANTON, Circuit Judge.

The plaintiff in error is a Pennsylvania corporation doing a warehouse business in that state, and the defendants in error are copartners engaged in the wholesale grocery business in New York state. The action is brought to recover $8,000 for the conversion of cases of salmon, title to which was in the plaintiff in error under a negotiable railroad bill of lading indorsed to it by the pledgor, Coccaro & Co., a partnership, in New York City...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases