IN RE TAUB

No. 34.

4 F.2d 993 (1924)

In re TAUB. Petition of DALZIEL.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

December 2, 1924.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

David Haar, of New York City, for trustee in bankruptcy.

Beekman, Bogue, Clark & Griscom, of New York City (William Campbell Armstrong, of New York City, of counsel), for Yakima Trust Co.

Before HOUGH and MANTON, Circuit Judges, and LEARNED HAND, District Judge.


HOUGH, Circuit Judge (after stating the facts as above).

It is proven, and was we think admitted, that Small and Taub were joint adventurers in the enterprise of procuring fruit in the vicinity of Yakima and marketing it in New York. The relation is now legally well known; it implies an agreement, but that agreement may not only be shown by parol (Burkardt v. Walsh, 49 App. Div. 634, 64 N.Y.S. 779); it may be implied in whole or in part from the conduct of the parties...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases