LOVELAND & HINYAN CO. v. PERE MARQUETTE R. CO.

No. 4085.

2 F.2d 948 (1924)

LOVELAND & HINYAN CO. et al. v. PERE MARQUETTE R. CO.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

December 2, 1924.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Clare J. Hall, of Grand Rapids, Mich. (Joseph R. Gillard, of Grand Rapids, Mich., on the brief), for appellants.

J. C. Kauffman, of Detroit, Mich. (William K. Williams and Seward L. Merriam, both of Detroit, Mich., on the brief), for appellee.

Before DENISON, MACK, and DONAHUE, Circuit Judges.


DENISON, Circuit Judge.

Upon the filing of creditors' bill in the court below, receivers were appointed for the Pere Marquette Railroad Company. It is at once apparent that the current and normal volume of valid claims made by shippers or consignees for failure to carry and deliver freight under the contract of shipment constitutes, in a certain broad sense, an operating expense, for, unless the railroads habitually paid such valid claims, they would soon have no...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases