1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 2 F.2d
  5. 2 F.2d 837 (1924)
 

MONROE BODY CO. v. HERZOG

No. 3840.

2 F.2d 837 (1924)

MONROE BODY CO. et. al. v. HERZOG et al.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

November 14, 1924.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Fred L. Chappell, of Kalamazoo, Mich. (Chappell & Earl, of Kalamazoo, Mich., on the brief), for appellants.

Wm. J. Belknap, of Detroit, Mich. (Whittemore, Hulbert, Whittemore & Belknap, of Detroit, Mich., on the brief), for appellees.

Before DENISON and DONAHUE, Circuit Judges, and SATER, District Judge.

SATER, District Judge.

When this case was here on the original appeal from the decree sustaining the Herzog patent and finding it infringed, the court, "with no intention of establishing a precedent," concluded not to dismiss the supplemental appeal, but suggested two methods of procedure, compliance with either of which would be satisfactory and result in retention and disposal of the case. 298 F. 423. Counsel entered into...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases