SWEET v. LANG


14 F.2d 758 (1924)

SWEET v. LANG et al.

District Court, D. Minnesota.

April 2, 1924.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Hugh V. Mercer, of Minneapolis, Minn., for plaintiff.

Cobb, Wheelwright, Hoke & Benson, of Minneapolis, Minn., for Carl W. Lang and others.

Boyesen, Otis & Brill, of St. Paul, Minn., for Northwestern Fuel Co.

Geo. M. Bleecker, of Minneapolis, Minn., for Kunz Oil Co.

Hubachek & Schall, of Minneapolis, Minn., for John W. Hayes et al.

D. W. George, of Minneapolis, Minn., for J. P. Eliason.

Bartlett & Bartlett, of Minneapolis, Minn., for Pure Oil Co.

F. W. Booth, of Minneapolis, Minn., for H. M. Libby.

Herbert T. Park, of Minneapolis, Minn., for Wallis Coach & Carriage Works.

G. A. Will, of Minneapolis, Minn., for Pence Auto Co. and McDermott-Wilser Co.

A. A. Tenner, of Minneapolis, Minn., for Henry W. Marsh et al.

A. M. Higgins, of Minneapolis, Minn., for Hennepin Steam Laundry Co.

Marsh & McLennan, of New York City, and Hubachek & Schall, of Minneapolis, Minn., for Edmund Dugan and Frank Dugan, etc.

Simon Meyers, by A. X. Schall, Jr., both of Minneapolis, Minn., for Leopold Metzger et al.

E. A. Prendergast, of Minneapolis, Minn., for Northwestern Bell Tel. Co.

T. J. Stevenson, of Minneapolis, Minn., for Elmer S. Best, M. D., and Carl W. Waldron.

Koon, Whelan & Hempstead, of Minneapolis, Minn., for Minneapolis General Electric Co. and Plymouth Clothing House.

M. H. Boutelle and Le Roy Bowen, both of Minneapolis, Minn., for John W. Thomas & Co. and Young-Quinlan Company.

Kingman, Cross, Morley & Cant, of Minneapolis, Minn., for Drs. De Vries and Davis.

Shaw, Safford, Putnam & Shaw, of Minneapolis, Minn., for Drs. DeVries and Davis.

M. C. O'Donnell, by L. A. Door, both of Minneapolis, Minn., for J. F. Brown et al.

Thomas Hessian, of Le Sueur, Minn., for First Nat. Bank of Le Sueur, Minn.

Irving M. Reiff, of Minneapolis, Minn., for Modern Milk Co.

Sam J. Levy, of Minneapolis, Minn., for Allen Brothers Drug Co. and John S. Smith.

Lancaster, Simpson, Junell & Dorsey, of Minneapolis, Minn., for Union Inv. Co.

Wright & Wright, of Minneapolis, Minn., for Willis P. Northey and Kuehn Heating Co.

C. E. Jennings, of Minneapolis, Minn., for Guy J. Bender.


CANT, District Judge.

It is not difficult to understand how some of the conditions which characterize the H. Poehler Company came to be. It was essentially a family corporation as we understand that term. In a rather old-fashioned way the stockholders and some of their relatives regarded it and made use of it as a matter of general convenience. It kept their accounts, and paid their bills, and served them in various ways, and when trouble came to the corporation,...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases