1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 1 F.2d
  5. 1 F.2d 662 (1924)
 

OHIO FUEL SUPPLY CO. v. PAXTON

No. 266.

1 F.2d 662 (1924)

OHIO FUEL SUPPLY CO. et al. v. PAXTON et al.

District Court, S. D. Ohio, E. D.

September 25, 1924.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Eagleson & Laylin, of Columbus, Ohio, for plaintiffs.

Joseph O. Fritz, Pros. Atty., of Wooster, Ohio, for defendant Russell.

SATER, District Judge.

The question for decision is raised by the answer of the treasurer of Wayne county. The correctness of the conclusion reached in City Railway Co. v. Beard (D. C.) 283 Fed. 313, 20 Ohio L. R. 213, is not questioned. The situation of the parties is the same as in that case, excepting as to the difference in the valuation fixed on plaintiffs' property with reference to its actual value and the amount of tax assessed against the same, and excepting...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases