CULLEN v. UNITED STATES

No. 4284.

2 F.2d 524 (1924)

CULLEN et al. v. UNITED STATES.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

October 20, 1924.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Alfred L. Bartlett, Thos. P. White, Leo M. Rosecrans, and Otto J. Emme, all of Los Angeles, Cal., for plaintiff in error King.

Schenck & Kittrelle and J. M. Bowen, both of Los Angeles, Cal., for plaintiffs in error Cullen and Dennison.

David V. Cahill and Charles L. Nichols, Sp. Asst. Attys. Gen., for the United States.

Before GILBERT, ROSS, and RUDKIN, Circuit Judges.


GILBERT, Circuit Judge.

The plaintiffs in error were convicted under an indictment which charged them with using the mails in a scheme to defraud, in violation of section 215 of the Penal Code (Comp. St. § 10385). It is contended that it was error to deny their motions for instructed verdicts of acquittal.

So far as the defendants Cullen and Dennison are concerned, the evidence was amply sufficient to justify the submission of the case to the jury. They...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases