1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 1 F.2d
  5. 1 F.2d 448 (1924)
 

LAMSON CO. v. R. H. STEARNS CO.

Nos. 1987, 1988.

1 F.2d 448 (1924)

LAMSON CO. v. R. H. STEARNS CO. SAME v. DENHOLM & McKAY CO.

District Court, D. Massachusetts.

September 25, 1924.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Robert Cushman, of Boston, Mass., for plaintiff.

Merrell E. Clark and Wm. P. Preble, both of New York City, for defendants.

A. H. Wellman, of Boston, Mass., for defendant R. H. Stearns Co.

W. P. Preble, of New York City, for defendant Denholm & McKay Co.

MORTON, District Judge.

The plaintiff is entitled to a preliminary injunction, unless the new evidence which the defendants intend to offer has such an important bearing upon the questions involved as to create doubt whether the same result will be reached in this case as in the one against the E. T Slattery Company (296 Fed. 724), already decided by the Circuit Court of Appeals for this circuit (299 Fed. 285). The new evidence consists only of the Fordyce apparatus...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases