HOUSE v. ROAD IMP. DIST.

Nos. 92 and 93.

266 U.S. 175 (1924)

HOUSE v. ROAD IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT NO. 2, OF CONWAY COUNTY, ARKANSAS, ET AL. HOUSE v. ROAD IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT NO. 5, OF CONWAY COUNTY, ARKANSAS, ET AL.

Supreme Court of United States.

Decided November 17, 1924.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Joseph M. Hill, with whom Mr. Henry L. Fitzhugh was on the brief, for plaintiff in error.

Mr. G.B. Rose and Mr. Lasker Ehrman, with whom Mr. Chas. T. Coleman, Mr. D.H. Cantrell, Mr. J.F. Loughborough and Mr. A.W. Dobyns were on the briefs, for defendants in error in No. 92.

Mr. G.B. Rose, with whom Mr. W.P. Strait, Mr. D.H. Cantrell, Mr. J.F. Loughborough and Mr. A.W. Dobyns were on the briefs, for defendants in error in No. 93.


MR. JUSTICE McREYNOLDS delivered the opinion of the Court.

Both of these writs must be dismissed.

No. 92.

The only ground suggested to sustain the writ in this cause is that Act No. 245, Arkansas Legislature, 1919, which established Road District No. 2 of Conway County, was duly challenged as repugnant to the Fourteenth Amendment. Such a challenge must be distinct and substantial.

The act undertook to create the district with boundaries...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases