1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 6 F.2d
  5. 6 F.2d 27 (1924)
 

BAIRD & DANIELS CO. v. VICTORY SPARKLER & SPECIALTY CO.

6 F.2d 27 (1924)

BAIRD & DANIELS CO., Inc., et al. v. VICTORY SPARKLER & SPECIALTY CO.

District Court, E. D. New York.

March 17, 1924.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Merrill, Rogers, Gifford & Woody, of New York City, for plaintiffs.

McManus, Ernst & Ernst, of New York City, for defendant.

INCH, District Judge.

This is a motion by plaintiff for judgment on the pleadings, which consist of a complaint and answer, pursuant to section 476 of the Civil Practice Act of the state of New York. This section warrants granting of judgment where the pleadings or the admissions of a party raise no question of fact that is material and necessary to be decided by a jury, either as to the cause of action or the defense.

I fail to find any question of fact presented...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases