MORGAN v. PATILLO

No. 231.

1 F.2d 326 (1924)

MORGAN v. PATILLO.

District Court, S. D. Florida.

July 11, 1924.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

W. M. Toomer and Stockton & Ulmer, all of Jacksonville, Fla., for complainant.

Bryan & Middlebrooks, of Atlanta, Ga., and George C. Bedell, of Jacksonville, Fla., for defendant.


CALL, District Judge.

This cause comes on for hearing upon the motions to strike certain paragraphs of defendant's answer.

Rule 21 of Equity Rules abolishes exceptions to answers for scandal and impertinence, but the court may upon motion order any redundant, impertinent, or scandalous matter stricken out. As I understand the rules of equity pleading prior to the adoption of the new Equity Rules, impertinence and scandal consisted of allegations in answers...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases