HOUGH, Circuit Judge (after stating the facts as above).
Plaintiff's exceptions to the admission of testimony are not well taken. It was not improper to permit an expert to characterize or interpret plaintiff's method of making gin, basing his characterization on what plaintiff's own witness had said. Nor is there any rule against what has been called at bar "empirical" testimony, by which we understand to be meant evidence as to the conduct of substances well known...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
