1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 2 F.2d
  5. 2 F.2d 109 (1924)
 

HARTFORD-FAIRMONT CO. v. UNITED STATES GLASS CO.

No. 356.

2 F.2d 109 (1924)

HARTFORD-FAIRMONT CO. v. UNITED STATES GLASS CO. (WILLIAM J. MILLER GLASS ENGINEERING CO., Intervener).

District Court, W. D. Pennsylvania.

May 4, 1924.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Bartlett & Brownell, of New York City, and Kay, Totten & Brown, of Pittsburgh, Pa., for plaintiff.

E. W. McCallister and Green & McCallister, all of Pittsburgh, Pa., for defendant United States Glass Co.

Edward A. Lawrence, of Pittsburgh, Pa., for intervening defendants.

Before BUFFINGTON, Circuit Judge, and SCHOONMAKER, District Judge.

SCHOONMAKER, District Judge.

The two Hitchcock patents in suit (Nos. 805,068, November 21, 1905, and reissue No. 13,929, June 5, 1915) are directed to two aspects of the same invention. They are a method and an apparatus for automatically feeding glass in the form of "gobs" into a mold.

In the old glass art, the ordinary method of procedure in making small articles of molten glass was for a workman to take a quantity of molten material from a furnace by the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases