1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 4 F.2d
  5. 4 F.2d 997 (1924)
 

McNAMARA v. CERF

No. 85.

4 F.2d 997 (1924)

McNAMARA v. CERF.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

December 8, 1924.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Hunt, Hill & Betts, of New York City (Joseph A. Barrett, of New York City, of counsel), for plaintiff in error.

Cardozo & Nathan, of New York City (Edgar J. Nathan and Michael H. Cardozo, Jr., both of New York City, of counsel), for defendant in error.

Before HOUGH and MANTON, Circuit Judges, and LEARNED HAND, District Judge.

PER CURIAM.

What is called a bill of exceptions in this record requires some notice. It is 118 printed pages long, of which at least 30 are wholly superfluous, in that they consist of colloquies between counsel — doubtless once important, but of no use on appeal. The remainder is in question and answer, although the legal result in several instances was that plaintiff offered certain testimony, which the court rejected. It seems to be necessary to remind the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases