1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 9 F.2d
  5. 9 F.2d 188 (1923)
 

I. T. S. RUBBER CO. v. MALAKOFF

No. 612.

9 F.2d 188 (1923)

I. T. S. RUBBER CO. v. MALAKOFF et al.

District Court, W. D. Pennsylvania.

August 9, 1923.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Winter, Brown & Critchlow, of Pittsburgh, Pa., and F. O. Richey, of Cleveland, Ohio, for plaintiff.

Horace Van Everen and Alfred H. Hildreth, both of Boston, Mass., for defendants.

SCHOONMAKER, District Judge.

This action was heard on bill, answer, and proofs. It is a suit in equity, brought by the I. T. S. Rubber Company versus Joseph Malakoff and Leo Ferber, trading as the Penn State Leather Company.

Defendants are jobbers, having a place of business in the city of Pittsburgh, dealing in leather, rubber heels, and other shoe findings.

The plaintiff alleges that the defendants have infringed its patent, reissue No. 14,049, granted...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases