1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. U.S.
  4. 254 U.S.
  5. 254 U.S. 233 (1920)
 

SAMPLINER v. MOTION PICTURE PATENTS CO.

No. 89.

254 U.S. 233 (1920)

SAMPLINER v. MOTION PICTURE PATENTS COMPANY ET AL.

Supreme Court of United States.

Decided December 6, 1920.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. John G. White, with whom Mr. Austin V. Cannon was on the brief, for plaintiff in error.

Mr. Samuel Seabury, with whom Mr. William M. Seabury, Mr. Robert H. McCarter, Mr. Charles F. Kingsley, Mr. Howard Thayer Kingsbury, Mr. Charles B. Samuels and Mr. Alfred P.W. Seaman were on the brief, for defendants in error.

MR. JUSTICE McREYNOLDS delivered the opinion of the court.

The opinion below is reported in 255 Fed. Rep. 242.

By an assignment executed in Ohio December 28, 1911, the Lake Shore Film and Supply Company, a corporation of that State, undertook to convey to plaintiff in error its claim and right of action against defendants for damages resulting from their violations of the Sherman Act. Relying upon the assignment he brought suit for $750,000 January 16, 1917...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases