NORTHERN PACIFIC RY. CO. v. SOLUM

Nos. 205, 206, 526.

247 U.S. 477 (1918)

NORTHERN PACIFIC RAILWAY COMPANY v. SOLUM. NORTHERN PACIFIC RAILWAY COMPANY v. MONARCH ELEVATOR COMPANY. NORTHERN PACIFIC RAILWAY COMPANY v. DULUTH ELEVATOR COMPANY.

Supreme Court of United States.

Decided June 10, 1918.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Charles Donnelly, with whom Mr. Charles W. Bunn was on the brief, for plaintiff in error.

Mr. Henry C. Flannery, Assistant Attorney General of the State of Minnesota, with whom Mr. Lyndon A. Smith, Attorney General of the State of Minnesota, was on the brief, for defendant in error in No. 205.

Mr. Ernest E. Watson, for defendants in error in Nos. 206 and 526, submitted.


MR. JUSTICE BRANDEIS delivered the opinion of the court.

These three cases were heard together. In each of them the plaintiff below sought to recover from the Northern Pacific Railway Company, in a state district court of Minnesota, an amount equal to that by which the freight collected for coal carried on an interstate route from Duluth to some other city in the State, exceeded the rate prescribed by the Minnesota law for carriage between those points on another...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases