1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. U.S.
  4. 245 U.S.
  5. 245 U.S. 446 (1918)
 

CINCINNATI v. CINCINNATI & H. TRAC. CO.

No. 10.

245 U.S. 446 (1918)

CITY OF CINCINNATI v. CINCINNATI & HAMILTON TRACTION COMPANY ET AL.

Supreme Court of United States.

Restored for reargument June 12, 1916.

reargued October 26, 27, 1916.

Restored for reargument May 7, 1917.

Reargued October 17, 18, 1917.

Decided January 7, 1918.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Charles A. Groom, with whom Mr. Constant Southworth was on the briefs, for appellant.1

Mr. Alfred C. Cassatt and Mr. Lawrence Maxwell, with whom Mr. George H. Warrington and Mr. Ellis G. Kinkead were on the briefs, for appellees.

Restored to docket for reargument June 12, 1916.

Restored to docket for reargument May 7, 1917.

MR. JUSTICE McREYNOLDS delivered the opinion of the court.

The Cincinnati and Hamilton Traction Company is owner and The Ohio Traction Company lessee and operator of an electric railway line extending from Vine Street, Cincinnati, northward along Erkenbrecher Avenue, Carthage Pike, Wayne Avenue, Springfield Pike...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases