KING v. PUTNAM INVESTMENT CO.

No. 10.

248 U.S. 23 (1918)

KING v. PUTNAM INVESTMENT COMPANY.

Supreme Court of United States.

Decided November 18, 1918.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Lee Monroe for plaintiff in error. Mr. James A. McClure and Mr. C.M. Monroe were also on the brief.

Mr. B.I. Litowich for defendant in error.


Memorandum for the court by THE CHIEF JUSTICE.

Having previously considered this case (82 Kansas, 216; 87 Kansas, 842) the court awarded relief because of the violation of a contract of employment to procure the sale of real estate. 96 Kansas, 109.

The case is here in reliance upon a federal question based upon the assumption that the authority to sell included land belonging to the United States covered by an inchoate homestead entry. But the court below...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases