CUMBERLAND GLASS CO. v. De WITT

No. 191.

237 U.S. 447 (1915)

CUMBERLAND GLASS MANUFACTURING COMPANY v. De WITT AND COMPANY.

Supreme Court of United States.

Decided May 10, 1915.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Henry H. Dinneen and Mr. Arthur L. Jackson for plaintiff in error.

Mr. Thomas G. Hayes and Mr. Lewis W. Lake for defendant in error.


MR. JUSTICE DAY delivered the opinion of the court.

Defendant in error, Charles De Witt, trading as Charles De Witt & Company, plaintiff in the court below and hereinafter spoken of as the plaintiff, brought his action in the Superior Court of Baltimore City, Maryland, to recover of the Cumberland Glass Manufacturing Company, hereinafter called the Glass Company, upon the ground that De Witt, having entered into a written contract with the Mallard Distilling Company...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases