SEIM v. HURD

No. 141.

232 U.S. 420 (1914)

SEIM v. HURD.

Supreme Court of United States.

Decided February 24, 1914.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. C.K. Offield for Seim.

Mr. Walter E. Ward for Hurd.


MR. JUSTICE HUGHES, after making the above statement, delivered the opinion of the court.

Hurd, a licensee for a limited territory under the Grant patent for rubber tires, joining with him the legal owner of the patent and the holder of an exclusive license subject to the rights of Hurd and another, brought suit against Seim and Reissig, for infringement. It is stated that the defendants purchased the infringing tires from the Diamond Rubber Company of New York and...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases