1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. U.S.
  4. 234 U.S.
  5. 234 U.S. 103 (1914)
 

CARLSON v. CURTISS

No. 307.

234 U.S. 103 (1914)

CARLSON v. STATE OF WASHINGTON, ON THE RELATION OF CURTISS.

Supreme Court of United States.

Decided May 25, 1914.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Corwin S. Shank for plaintiff in error.

There was no appearance or brief filed for defendant in error.

MR. JUSTICE PITNEY delivered the opinion of the court.

Plaintiff in error was adjudged by the Superior Court of Thurston County, in the State of Washington, to be in contempt of that court, in that, with notice of a decree made by it restraining and enjoining any further excavation of the Lake Washington Canal, or any lowering of the waters of Lake Washington, he proceeded to blow out an embankment at the head of the canal, which until that

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases