1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. U.S.
  4. 229 U.S.
  5. 229 U.S. 511 (1913)
 

CHI., B. & Q.R.R. v. HALL

No. 249.

229 U.S. 511 (1913)

CHICAGO, BURLINGTON & QUINCY RAILROAD CO. v. HALL.

Supreme Court of United States.

Decided June 9, 1913.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. T. Byron Clark and Mr. Arthur R. Wells for plaintiff in error.

Mr. J.O. Detweiler for defendant in error.

MR. JUSTICE LAMAR, after making the foregoing statement of facts, delivered the opinion of the court.

Hall, a married man, head of a family and insolvent, worked as a switchman for the railroad company in Nebraska, his wages being exempt from garnishment by the laws of that State. While temporarily absent in Iowa, two suits were there brought against him, summons of garnishment being served upon the Railroad's agent in Iowa where it had been held that the Nebraska...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases