UNITED STATES v. BALT. & OHIO R.R. CO.

No. 385.

231 U.S. 274 (1913)

UNITED STATES v. BALTIMORE & OHIO RAILROAD COMPANY.

Supreme Court of United States.

Decided December 1, 1913.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Solicitor General Bullitt for the United States.

Mr. P.J. Farrell for the Interstate Commerce Commission.

Mr. Ernest A. Bigelow for the Federal Sugar Refining Company:

Mr. George F. Brownell, with whom Mr. H.A. Taylor was on the brief, for the Railroad Companies, appellees.

Mr. H.B. Closson for the Brooklyn Eastern District Terminal, appellee.

Mr. William N. Dykman for the Jay Street Terminal and Arbuckle Brothers, appellees.


MR. JUSTICE LURTON delivered the opinion of the court.

This appeal involves the legality of an order made by the Interstate Commerce Commission holding that certain allowances made by the appellees to Arbuckle Brothers on sugar shipped by them over one or another of the railroad companies' lines constitute an illegal preference or discrimination in violation of the Act to Regulate Commerce. The order of the Commission required...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases