INTERSTATE COMM. COM. v. C., B. & Q.R.R. CO.

No. 641.

218 U.S. 113 (1910)

INTERSTATE COMMERCE COMMISSION v. CHICAGO, BURLINGTON AND QUINCY RAILROAD COMPANY.

Supreme Court of United States.

Decided May 31, 1910.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Wade H. Ellis and Mr. Luther M. Walter, Special Assistants to the Attorney General, with whom Mr. Edwin P. Grosvenor, Special Assistant to the Attorney General, was on the brief, for appellant.

Mr. William D. McHugh and Mr. Samuel A. Lynde for appellees.


MR. JUSTICE McKENNA delivered the opinion of the court.

This case was argued and submitted with Nos. 663 and 664, as involving the same general questions. It was disposed of in the court below with those cases in the same opinion, (171 Fed. Rep. 680,) and on the same ground, to wit, that the effect of the order of the Commission to enjoin which the suit was brought apportioned "out the country into zones tributary to given trade centers and not tributary to others...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases