HARTEN v. LOFFLER

No. 91.

212 U.S. 397 (1909)

HARTEN v. LOFFLER.

Supreme Court of United States.

Decided February 23, 1909.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Lorenzo A. Bailey for plaintiff in error.

Mr. Leon Tobriner, for defendant in error, submitted.


MR. JUSTICE PECKHAM, after making the foregoing statement, delivered the opinion of the court.

The defendant in error objects that this court is without jurisdiction on the ground of the amount in controversy not being sufficient. Taking the pleadings, the evidence given, and the verdict of the jury, it would seem that the amount in dispute is sufficient to give this court jurisdiction. In his setoff the defendant claims the unpaid balance of the purchase price for...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases